Ping tpaliwoda
Posted: Thu 21 Jan 10, 4:04
Have a question for you as PPO.....
Most of the DF25/800 pictures I see have two shrouds, both going aft and one (the top one) with tackle. Some newer boats appear to have only one, with tackle for tensioning.
Mine has one that goes forward, and attaches forward of the forward beam. Then there's the aft one, which forks to an attachment about mid ships, then aft to the tackle.
Is this a PCMould thing? Did you or Stew do this? If so what's the thinking?
I do like it, because for the life of me I can't see the whole front of the float hanging on the beam hinge point on the hull. Every wave you bang in to there has to be a huge stress on the whole flying hull, as the arm is quite long.....
Also, all three are on the outboard side, which has to introduce a lateral twisting moment to the float. Newer boats show one outboard and the aft one inboard, aft of the aft beam, BUT this is on the longer float. Mine is the original short one, and the inboard one would have to be forward of the aft beam and would interfere with the beam when folding. Still, I plan on bringing the tackle inboard, and leaving the outboard attachment so I can bring it outboard when folding. I have reinforced the hull where the inboard mount would go. In fact have reinforced the hull where all the shrouds attach.....
Finally, the forward beam on at least one side without the forward shroud attached appears to be drooping a little..... Do I need to address this? Re drill the mount and upsize the pin? With the shroud attached and tensioned the only load would be in compression and would take care of any drooping....
Any thoughts?
Most of the DF25/800 pictures I see have two shrouds, both going aft and one (the top one) with tackle. Some newer boats appear to have only one, with tackle for tensioning.
Mine has one that goes forward, and attaches forward of the forward beam. Then there's the aft one, which forks to an attachment about mid ships, then aft to the tackle.
Is this a PCMould thing? Did you or Stew do this? If so what's the thinking?
I do like it, because for the life of me I can't see the whole front of the float hanging on the beam hinge point on the hull. Every wave you bang in to there has to be a huge stress on the whole flying hull, as the arm is quite long.....
Also, all three are on the outboard side, which has to introduce a lateral twisting moment to the float. Newer boats show one outboard and the aft one inboard, aft of the aft beam, BUT this is on the longer float. Mine is the original short one, and the inboard one would have to be forward of the aft beam and would interfere with the beam when folding. Still, I plan on bringing the tackle inboard, and leaving the outboard attachment so I can bring it outboard when folding. I have reinforced the hull where the inboard mount would go. In fact have reinforced the hull where all the shrouds attach.....
Finally, the forward beam on at least one side without the forward shroud attached appears to be drooping a little..... Do I need to address this? Re drill the mount and upsize the pin? With the shroud attached and tensioned the only load would be in compression and would take care of any drooping....
Any thoughts?